Usage Score
28.4
Player Dossier
2014-2018Florida Atlantic
WR • 6'0" • 165 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Jovon Durante reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.4
Efficiency
84.2
Consistency
59.4
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jovon Durante, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic. Jovon Durante reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jovon Durante played WR for West Virginia and Florida Atlantic. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jovon Durante recorded 54 rushing yards, 1,582 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Florida Atlantic.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Florida Atlantic paired 873 primary output with 84.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across West Virginia, Florida Atlantic.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
72.8
Efficiency
84.2
Usage
28.4
Consistency
59.4
Best Game by takeover score
Charlotte
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 52. Air Force: 174. Unknown: 72. UCF: 35. Middle Tennessee: 53. Old Dominion: 111. Marshall: 114. Louisiana Tech: 27. Florida International: 55. Western Kentucky: 79. North Texas: 90. Charlotte: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 4 by 86.7. Air Force: 12 by 96.7. Unknown: 7 by 68.6. UCF: 4 by 58.3. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Old Dominion: 7 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 60. Florida International: 4 by 91.7. Western Kentucky: 7 by 75.2. North Texas: 6 by 100. Charlotte: 1 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Charlotte | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/16 | @ North Texas | L 38-41 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Western Kentucky | W 34-15 | — | 7 | 79 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Florida International2+ TD | W 49-14 | — | 4 | 55 | 10.5 | 13.80 | 2 | 28 |
| Fri 10/26 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 13-21 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards | L 7-31 | — | 7 | 114 | 15.4 | 16.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Old Dominion100 receiving yards | W 52-33 | — | 7 | 111 | 15.9 | 15.90 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 24-25 | — | 3 | 53 | 16.5 | 17.70 | 0 | 45 |
| Fri 9/21 | @ UCF | L 36-56 | — | 4 | 35 | 7.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | W 33-26 | — | 12 | 174 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Oklahoma | L 14-63 | — | 4 | 52 | 8.2 | 13 | 0 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
West Virginia
2014-2016
Opening stop
Florida Atlantic
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | West Virginia | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | West Virginia | 378 | 76.2 | 14.4 | 378 |
| 2016 Postseason | West Virginia | 331 | 54.7 | 17.3 | -47 |
| 2016 Regular Season | West Virginia | 331 | 54.7 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 873 | 84.2 | 28.4 | 542 |
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174
Primary metric
174 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Southern
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
873 primary output · 84.2 efficiency · 28.4 usage
66.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · West Virginia
41.6
378 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 14.4 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · West Virginia
39.6
331 primary · 54.7 efficiency · 17.3 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9314
Miramar · Miami, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,582
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.