Player Stats

Montre Hartage College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
168
TFL
4
Passes defended
29

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonNorthwestern00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonNorthwestern134-0--052.6
2016 Regular SeasonNorthwestern1356-0-9052.6
2017 PostseasonNorthwestern134-0-1048.9
2017 Regular SeasonNorthwestern135320-6048.9
2018 Regular SeasonNorthwestern115120-13055.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Northwestern paired 17 primary output with 34.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 34.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Northwestern

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

34.8

Usage

5.1

Consistency

45.1

Best Game by takeover score

Nebraska

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 2. Duke: 1. Akron: 2. Michigan: 0. Michigan State: 3. Nebraska: 2. Rutgers: 1. Wisconsin: 4. Notre Dame: 1. Iowa: 0. Ohio State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 6 by 45. Duke: 1 by 14.2. Akron: 4 by 36.7. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Michigan State: 4 by 46.7. Nebraska: 9 by 57.5. Rutgers: 2 by 18.3. Wisconsin: 5 by 60.8. Notre Dame: 6 by 35. Iowa: 5 by 20.8. Ohio State: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 6 · +1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -1 vs Wins

Next best actions

Keep exploring Montre Hartage

Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.