Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Tulane paired 783 primary output with 56 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 52.6 |
| 2018 Postseason | Tulane | 13 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 64.9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulane | 13 | 752 | 752 | 0 | 7 | 64.9 |
| 2019 Postseason | Tulane | 12 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 58.8 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulane | 12 | 569 | 569 | 0 | 7 | 58.8 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Tulane paired 783 primary output with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 78 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
48.4
Efficiency
66.6
Usage
9.8
Consistency
66.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 12. Florida International: 76. Auburn: 23. Missouri State: 32. Houston: 71. Army: 75. UConn: 87. Memphis: 13. Tulsa: 78. Temple: 4. UCF: 58. SMU: 52
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 3 by 35.4. Florida International: 3 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 47.9. Missouri State: 3 by 94.4. Houston: 8 by 87. Army: 9 by 84.7. UConn: 5 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 45.1. Tulsa: 10 by 81.3. Temple: 3 by 13.9. UCF: 11 by 54.9. SMU: 10 by 54.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.