Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2015-2020Western Kentucky
Ben Holt
LB • 5'11" • 225 lbs • Bowling Green, KY, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ben Holt shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
45.4
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
19.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
1516161717181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Western Kentucky • Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Holt, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Western Kentucky. Ben Holt shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Western Kentucky paired 17 primary output with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 45.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Kentucky, Purdue.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
45.4
Usage
10.8
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 0. Vanderbilt: 1.5. TCU: 0. Minnesota: 2.5. Penn State: 0. Maryland: 2.5. Iowa: 0. Illinois: 1.5. Nebraska: 0. Northwestern: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Indiana: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 7 by 29.2. Vanderbilt: 11 by 60.8. TCU: 17 by 50. Minnesota: 9 by 62.5. Penn State: 11 by 45.8. Maryland: 5 by 45.8. Iowa: 7 by 29.2. Illinois: 12 by 65. Nebraska: 10 by 41.7. Northwestern: 10 by 51.7. Wisconsin: 5 by 20.8. Indiana: 10 by 41.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=4 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=8 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
65 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Indiana10+ tackles | L 41-44 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Wisconsin | L 24-45 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Northwestern10+ tackles | W 24-22 | 10 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Nebraska10+ tackles | W 31-27 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Illinois10+ tackles | L 6-24 | 12 | 7 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Iowa | L 20-26 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Maryland | W 40-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Penn State10+ tackles | L 7-35 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Minnesota | L 31-38 | 9 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs TCU10+ tackles | L 13-34 | 17 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Vanderbilt10+ tackles | W 42-24 | 11 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Nevada | L 31-34 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Kentucky
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Purdue
2019-2020
Final stop
Season Progression
20152016201620172017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 5.5 | 16.7 | 3.7 | 5.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 5.5 | 16.7 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 5 | 21.3 | 5.5 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 5 | 21.3 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 17 | 50.3 | 13 | 12 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 9 | 45.4 | 10.8 | -8 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -9 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67.6 takeover score.
#2
Minnesota
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.2 takeover score.
#3
Louisville
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#4
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
#5
Marshall
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
17 primary output · 50.3 efficiency · 13 usage
32.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
19.4
9 primary · 45.4 efficiency · 10.8 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Western Kentucky
10.5
5 primary · 21.3 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
12
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
303
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.