Usage Score
2.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018Vanderbilt
Donovan Sheffield
CB • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Donovan Sheffield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.4
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
13.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
1516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Donovan Sheffield, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Vanderbilt. Donovan Sheffield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Vanderbilt paired 0 primary output with 5.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 19.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
19.4
Usage
2.8
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 0. Middle Tennessee: 1. Nevada: 2. Notre Dame: 0. South Carolina: 1. Unknown: 0. Georgia: 0. Florida: 0. Kentucky: 1. Arkansas: 0. Ole Miss: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 35. Nevada: 0 by 20. Notre Dame: 7 by 29.2. South Carolina: 7 by 39.2. Unknown: 5 by 20.8. Georgia: 2 by 8.3. Florida: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 3 by 12.5. Ole Miss: 3 by 17.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.9 · Games = 4 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
39.2 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | vs Baylor | L 38-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Ole Miss | W 36-29 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Arkansas | W 45-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Kentucky | L 7-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Florida | L 27-37 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Georgia | L 13-41 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs South Carolina | L 14-37 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-22 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Nevada | W 41-10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 35-7 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | 5.8 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1 | 9.8 | 1.6 | 1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 5.5 | 19.4 | 2.8 | 4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 5.5 | 19.4 | 2.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#2
Nevada
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.2 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.9 takeover score.
#5
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
0 primary output · 5.8 efficiency · 1 usage
35.6
#2
2018 Postseason · Vanderbilt
13.1
5.5 primary · 19.4 efficiency · 2.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
13.1
5.5 primary · 19.4 efficiency · 2.8 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8846
Ensworth · Nashville, TN
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
59
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.