Usage Score
21
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ohio State
K.J. Hill
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Little Rock, AR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
K.J. Hill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71
Consistency
71.2
Season Value
59.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio State
1616171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
K.J. Hill, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio State. K.J. Hill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Ohio State paired 885 primary output with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
45.4
Efficiency
71
Usage
21
Consistency
71.2
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 67. Florida Atlantic: 21. Cincinnati: 57. Indiana: 23. Miami (OH): 78. Nebraska: 39. Michigan State: 57. Northwestern: 19. Wisconsin: 11. Maryland: 56. Rutgers: 62. Penn State: 46. Michigan: 17. Wisconsin: 83
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 6 by 74.4. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 46.7. Cincinnati: 8 by 47.5. Indiana: 2 by 76.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 100. Nebraska: 5 by 52. Michigan State: 7 by 54.3. Northwestern: 2 by 63.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 73.3. Maryland: 4 by 93.3. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Penn State: 4 by 76.7. Michigan: 2 by 56.7. Wisconsin: 7 by 79
Split Comparison
Wins43.8 · n=13
First Half48.9 · n=7 · +6.9 vs Second Half
Second Half42 · n=7 · -6.9 vs First Half
All Games45.4 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Clemson | L 23-29 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Wisconsin2+ TD | W 34-21 | — | 7 | 83 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan | W 56-27 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Penn State | W 28-17 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Rutgers | W 56-21 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Maryland | W 73-14 | — | 4 | 56 | 11.4 | 14 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-7 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Northwestern | W 52-3 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Michigan State | W 34-10 | — | 7 | 57 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Nebraska | W 48-7 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Miami (OH) | W 76-5 | — | 2 | 78 | 39 | 39 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Indiana | W 51-10 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs CincinnatiHigh volume | W 42-0 | — | 8 | 57 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 45-21 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 262 | 73.4 | 10.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 262 | 73.4 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 549 | 59 | 19 | 287 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 549 | 59 | 19 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 885 | 76.6 | 18.2 | 336 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 885 | 76.6 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Ohio State | 636 | 71 | 21 | -249 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 636 | 71 | 21 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
187
Primary metric
187 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 79 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
885 primary output · 76.6 efficiency · 18.2 usage
63.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Ohio State
63.1
885 primary · 76.6 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Ohio State
59.8
636 primary · 71 efficiency · 21 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.933
North Little Rock · North Little Rock, AR
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,332
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.