Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2015-2017Ohio State
TE • 6'2" • 252 lbs • Burke, VA, USA
A.J. Alexander reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
—
Season Value
—
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Alexander, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State. A.J. Alexander reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
A.J. Alexander played TE for Ohio State. Across 3 tracked seasons, A.J. Alexander recorded 27 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Ohio State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio State paired 27 primary output with 36.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
0
Receiving Yards / G
—
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
—
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
33.3 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/7 | @ East Carolina | — | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 27 | 36.7 | 6.6 | 27 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 27 | 36.7 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | -27 |
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
15
Primary metric
15 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#4
Clemson
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
27 primary output · 36.7 efficiency · 6.6 usage
38.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
38.8
27 primary · 36.7 efficiency · 6.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Ohio State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7633
Smyrna · Smyrna, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
27
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.