Player Dossier

2015-2018

Central Michigan

Jamil Sabbagh

WR • 5'9" • 200 lbs • Dearborn, MI, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Jamil Sabbagh reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

9.3

Efficiency

62.5

Consistency

34.6

Season Value

48.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan

15161718

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
4
Program Path
Central Michigan
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jamil Sabbagh, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Jamil Sabbagh reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Central Michigan paired 69 primary output with 62.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 62.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

9.9

Efficiency

62.5

Usage

9.3

Consistency

34.6

Best Game by takeover score

Akron

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 11. Kansas: 41. Unknown: 0. Michigan State: 0. Ball State: 11. Western Michigan: 0. Akron: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 2 by 36.7. Kansas: 2 by 100. Ball State: 1 by 73.3. Akron: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Losses11.5 · n=6
First Half13 · n=4 · +7.3 vs Second Half
Second Half5.7 · n=3 · -7.3 vs First Half
All Games9.9 · n=7

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

7 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Kansas

Best efficiency game

100 vs Kansas

Result
Sat 10/27@ AkronL 10-17166606
Sat 10/20vs Western MichiganL 10-35
Sat 10/13vs Ball StateL 23-241111111011
Sat 9/29@ Michigan StateL 20-31
Sat 9/22vs Unknown
Sat 9/8vs KansasL 7-3124120.520.50131
Sat 9/1@ KentuckyL 20-352115.75.5006

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Central Michigan

    2015-2018

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2015201620172018
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2015 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan0
2016 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan64046
2017 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan746.76.31
2018 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan6962.59.362

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Kansas

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

41

Primary metric

41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Ball State

7

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.

#3

Ohio

6

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.

#4

Ball State

11

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.

#5

Kentucky

11

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan

69 primary output · 62.5 efficiency · 9.3 usage

48.7

#2

2017 Regular Season · Central Michigan

40.5

7 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 6.3 usage

#3

2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan

14.6

6 primary · 40 efficiency · 4 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2015 · Rating 0.8139

Fordson · Dearborn, MI

Committed To
Central Michigan
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2015

Career Facts

1

Career teams

4

Seasons tracked

82

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Jamil Sabbagh quick answers

Recruiting profile

3-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
4
Career receiving yards
82