Player Stats

Da'Quaun Jamison College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
143
TFL
9
Sacks
1
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan11-0--037.2
2017 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan93310-5032.5
2018 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan114130-3028.2
2019 PostseasonCentral Michigan137-0-1062.3
2019 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan13615146062.3
2020 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Central Michigan paired 19 primary output with 36.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 36.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Central Michigan

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

36.4

Usage

9.3

Consistency

35.7

Best Game by takeover score

Bowling Green

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 1. UAlbany: 1.5. Wisconsin: 2. Akron: 0. Miami: 1. Western Michigan: 1. Eastern Michigan: 1. New Mexico State: 0. Bowling Green: 5. Northern Illinois: 2. Ball State: 0.5. Toledo: 4. Miami (OH): 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 7 by 39.2. UAlbany: 2 by 23.3. Wisconsin: 9 by 57.5. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Miami: 6 by 35. Western Michigan: 6 by 35. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 26.7. New Mexico State: 7 by 29.2. Bowling Green: 6 by 75. Northern Illinois: 4 by 36.7. Ball State: 5 by 25.8. Toledo: 6 by 65. Miami (OH): 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 8 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Wins