Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2016-2020Central Michigan
Da'Quaun Jamison
DB • 6'0" • 198 lbs • Leesburg, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Da'Quaun Jamison shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
33.3
Consistency
50.5
Season Value
28.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
161718191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Da'Quaun Jamison, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Da'Quaun Jamison shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
33.3
Usage
10.2
Consistency
50.5
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 1. Unknown: 1.5. Wisconsin: 2. Akron: 0. Miami: 1. Western Michigan: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Bowling Green: 2. Northern Illinois: 2. Ball State: 0.5. Toledo: 4. Miami (OH): 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 7 by 39.2. Unknown: 2 by 23.3. Wisconsin: 9 by 57.5. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Miami: 6 by 35. Western Michigan: 6 by 35. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 16.7. New Mexico State: 7 by 29.2. Bowling Green: 6 by 45. Northern Illinois: 4 by 36.7. Ball State: 5 by 25.8. Toledo: 6 by 65. Miami (OH): 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=5 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=6 · +0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
65 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ San Diego State | L 11-48 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Miami (OH) | L 21-26 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | vs ToledoSplash game | W 49-7 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Ball State | W 45-44 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Northern Illinois | W 48-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Bowling GreenSplash game | W 38-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-28 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-16 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Western Michigan | L 15-31 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Miami | L 12-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Akron | W 45-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-61 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 6 | 21.9 | 3 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 7 | 22.8 | 5 | 1 |
| 2019 Postseason | Central Michigan | 15 | 33.3 | 10.2 | 8 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 15 | 33.3 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | -15 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#2
Toledo
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.
#3
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#4
Bowling Green
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.2 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35
#2
2019 Postseason · Central Michigan
28.8
15 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan
28.8
15 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7826
Lee County · Leesburg, GA
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
143
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.