Usage Score
1.1
Player Dossier
2015-2017Central Michigan
Deshawn Baker-Williams
DL • 6'4" • 305 lbs • Westland, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Deshawn Baker-Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
6.9
Consistency
100
Season Value
36
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
15161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deshawn Baker-Williams, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan. Deshawn Baker-Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with 6.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 6.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
6.9
Usage
1.1
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Eastern Michigan: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 2 by 8.3. Miami (OH): 2 by 8.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2
All Games0 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
8.3 vs Tulsa
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 0 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.2 takeover score.
#2
Miami (OH)
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.2 takeover score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
0 primary output · 6.9 efficiency · 1.1 usage
36
#2
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
36
0 primary · 6.9 efficiency · 1.1 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Central Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7652
John Glenn · Westland, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
5
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.