Player Stats

Darnell Savage Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
170
TFL
9
Sacks
1
Passes defended
14
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonMaryland00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonMaryland11310-1046.5
2016 Regular SeasonMaryland11562.51-3046.5
2017 Regular SeasonMaryland1259-0-8353.7
2018 Regular SeasonMaryland12525.50-2265.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Maryland paired 11.5 primary output with 29.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 29.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Maryland

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

29.3

Usage

12.4

Consistency

34.1

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas: 3. Bowling Green: 0. Temple: 3. Minnesota: 0. Michigan: 1. Rutgers: 2. Iowa: 1. Illinois: 0. Michigan State: 0. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 1.5. Penn State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 6 by 55. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Temple: 7 by 59.2. Minnesota: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 6 by 35. Iowa: 6 by 35. Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Michigan State: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Ohio State: 9 by 52.5. Penn State: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Wins