Player Stats

Ty Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,953
Rushing yards
2,635
Receiving yards
318
Touchdowns
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonMaryland928025030333.9
2016 PostseasonMaryland1317415915267.4
2016 Regular SeasonMaryland131,036845191567.4
2017 Regular SeasonMaryland1293587560867.8
2018 Regular SeasonMaryland952850622547.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Maryland paired 935 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 60.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Maryland

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

58.7

Efficiency

60.1

Usage

15.9

Consistency

41.7

Best Game by takeover score

Minnesota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas: 51. Bowling Green: 123. Temple: 23. Minnesota: 123. Michigan: 3. Rutgers: 132. Iowa: 17. Illinois: 18. Indiana: 38

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 14 by 32.2. Bowling Green: 13 by 89.4. Temple: 6 by 39.9. Minnesota: 11 by 96.6. Michigan: 5 by 6.3. Rutgers: 9 by 100. Iowa: 6 by 35.2. Illinois: 3 by 62.5. Indiana: 5 by 79.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins89.4 · Games = 5 · +69.2 vs Losses
Losses20.3 · Games = 4 · -69.2 vs Wins