Usage Score
28
Player Dossier
2015-2016Arizona State
Tim White
WR • 5'11" • Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tim White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.2
Consistency
67.6
Season Value
69.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State. Tim White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 713 primary output with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
59.4
Efficiency
81.2
Usage
28
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 95. Texas Tech: 40. UTSA: 0. California: 86. USC: 84. UCLA: 123. Colorado: 97. Washington State: 48. Oregon: 0. Utah: 50. Washington: 21. Arizona: 69
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 9 by 70.4. Texas Tech: 6 by 44.4. California: 6 by 95.6. USC: 7 by 80. UCLA: 11 by 74.5. Colorado: 5 by 100. Washington State: 3 by 100. Utah: 2 by 100. Washington: 3 by 46.7. Arizona: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins62.3 · n=4 · +9.5 vs Losses
Losses52.7 · n=7 · -9.5 vs Wins
First Half71.3 · n=6 · +23.8 vs Second Half
Second Half47.5 · n=6 · -23.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Arizona | L 35-56 | — | 4 | 69 | 12.6 | 17.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Washington | L 18-44 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 11/11 | vs Utah | L 26-49 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Oregon | L 35-54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Washington State | L 32-37 | — | 3 | 48 | 11 | 16 | 0 | 40 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Colorado | L 16-40 | — | 5 | 97 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 0 | 44 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-20 | — | 11 | 123 | 9.7 | 11.20 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ USC | L 20-41 | — | 7 | 84 | 10.9 | 12 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs California | W 51-41 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTSA | W 32-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Texas Tech | W 68-55 | — | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 9 | 95 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Arizona State | 633 | 69.4 | 19.5 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 633 | 69.4 | 19.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 713 | 81.2 | 28 | 80 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144
Primary metric
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 74.5 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
95
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 70.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
713 primary output · 81.2 efficiency · 28 usage
69.1
#2
2015 Postseason · Arizona State
56.3
633 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Arizona State
56.3
633 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9673
Hart · Santa Clarita, CA
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,346
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.