Player Stats

Darrell Taylor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
118
TFL
26.5
Sacks
19.5
QB hurries
17
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTennessee591031016.4
2017 Regular SeasonTennessee9274.5352046.4
2018 Regular SeasonTennessee11361183-057.4
2019 PostseasonTennessee13621.51-073.1
2019 Regular SeasonTennessee13408754073.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Tennessee paired 28.5 primary output with 35.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 35.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Tennessee

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.2

Efficiency

35.9

Usage

11.8

Consistency

58.3

Best Game by takeover score

South Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 4.5. Georgia State: 2. BYU: 3. Chattanooga: 0. Florida: 1. Georgia: 2. Mississippi State: 4. Alabama: 0. South Carolina: 6. UAB: 2. Kentucky: 2. Missouri: 1. Vanderbilt: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 6 by 70. Georgia State: 2 by 28.3. BYU: 8 by 63.3. Florida: 6 by 35. Georgia: 3 by 32.5. Mississippi State: 5 by 60.8. Alabama: 3 by 12.5. South Carolina: 4 by 66.7. UAB: 2 by 28.3. Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Missouri: 1 by 14.2. Vanderbilt: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.6 · Games = 8 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · Games = 5 · -1.0 vs Wins