Player Stats

Chris Garrison College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
355
Receptions
30
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonBoston College4590057
2017 Regular SeasonBoston College815152171.6
2018 Regular SeasonBoston College6555048.7
2019 Regular SeasonBoston College3558151.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Boston College paired 152 primary output with 67.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

19.3

Efficiency

78.9

Usage

9.9

Consistency

54.3

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Richmond: 14. Kansas: 13. Wake Forest: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Richmond: 1 by 93.3. Kansas: 2 by 43.3. Wake Forest: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins14 · Games = 1 · -8 vs Losses
Losses22 · Games = 2 · +8 vs Wins