Player Stats

Antwan Dixon College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,208
Receptions
111
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonKent State826355374.8
2016 Regular SeasonKent State0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonKent State0-00-
2018 Regular SeasonKent State1152532281.1
2019 PostseasonKent State11599156.6
2019 Regular SeasonKent State1128222056.6
2020 Regular SeasonKent State0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Kent State paired 532 primary output with 69.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 54.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Kent State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

29.2

Efficiency

54.6

Usage

17.2

Consistency

54.1

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 99. Arizona State: 44. Auburn: 30. Bowling Green: 29. Wisconsin: 14. Akron: 38. Ohio: -3. Miami (OH): 41. Toledo: 0. Ball State: 15. Eastern Michigan: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 5 by 100. Arizona State: 4 by 73.3. Auburn: 4 by 50. Bowling Green: 3 by 64.4. Wisconsin: 2 by 46.7. Akron: 5 by 50.7. Ohio: 2 by 0. Miami (OH): 4 by 68.3. Toledo: 1 by 0. Ball State: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins39 · Games = 5 · +18 vs Losses
Losses21 · Games = 6 · -18 vs Wins