Usage Score
20.2
Player Dossier
2015-2018Kentucky
Josh Allen
LB • 6'5" • 260 lbs • Montclair, NJ, USA
High-volume tacklerDown-to-down presence
Josh Allen shows a high-volume tackler profile with 56.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
56.9
Consistency
62.8
Season Value
47.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Kentucky
15161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Kentucky
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Allen, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Kentucky. Josh Allen shows a high-volume tackler profile with 56.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Kentucky paired 41.5 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Kentucky
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
3.2
Efficiency
56.9
Usage
20.2
Consistency
62.8
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 6. Central Michigan: 4. Florida: 2.5. Unknown: 0. Mississippi State: 4. South Carolina: 7. Texas A&M: 1. Vanderbilt: 5. Missouri: 4. Georgia: 0. Tennessee: 2. Middle Tennessee: 4. Louisville: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 4 by 66.7. Central Michigan: 10 by 81.7. Florida: 5 by 45.8. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 6 by 65. South Carolina: 8 by 83.3. Texas A&M: 4 by 26.7. Vanderbilt: 8 by 83.3. Missouri: 11 by 85.8. Georgia: 3 by 12.5. Tennessee: 6 by 45. Middle Tennessee: 15 by 90. Louisville: 4 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins4.3 · n=9 · +3.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=3 · -3.3 vs Wins
First Half3.5 · n=7 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half2.8 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
90 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Penn State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 27-24 | 4 | 4 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Louisville | W 56-10 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Middle Tennessee10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | W 34-23 | 15 | 8 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tennessee | L 7-24 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Georgia | L 17-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Missouri10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | W 15-14 | 11 | 9 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Vanderbilt2+ sacks · Splash game | W 14-7 | 8 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-20 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs South Carolina2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-10 | 8 | 6 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Mississippi StateSplash game | W 28-7 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Florida | W 27-16 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Central Michigan10+ tackles · Splash game | W 35-20 | 10 | 6 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kentucky
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 15.5 | 31.8 | 11.2 | 15.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 15.5 | 31.8 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Kentucky | 21.5 | 37.7 | 17.3 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kentucky | 21.5 | 37.7 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Kentucky | 41.5 | 56.9 | 20.2 | 20 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kentucky | 41.5 | 56.9 | 20.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 73.9 takeover score.
#2
Missouri
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
#3
Southern Miss
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
#4
Vanderbilt
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.3 takeover score.
#5
Penn State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Kentucky
41.5 primary output · 56.9 efficiency · 20.2 usage
47.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Kentucky
47.2
41.5 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 20.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Kentucky
35.2
21.5 primary · 37.7 efficiency · 17.3 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
8
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7967
Montclair · Montclair, NJ
- Committed To
- Kentucky
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
216
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.