Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Georgia
Jayson Stanley
WR • 6'2" • 207 lbs • Fairburn, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jayson Stanley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
20.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Georgia
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Georgia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jayson Stanley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Georgia. Jayson Stanley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Georgia paired 23 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Georgia
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
1.8
Efficiency
60
Usage
5.9
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 9. Florida: 0. Kentucky: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Alabama: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins2.3 · n=4
First Half3 · n=3 · +3 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=2 · -3 vs First Half
All Games1.8 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
60 vs Middle Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia | 23 | 76.7 | 10 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | — | -23 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia | 9 | 60 | 5.9 | 9 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
23
Primary metric
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Vanderbilt
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
0
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Georgia
23 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 10 usage
52.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · Georgia
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Georgia
20.5
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9081
Creekside · Fairburn, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
32
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.