Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2018UTSA
TE • 6'3" • 245 lbs • Irving, TX, USA
T.J. King reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
15
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
T.J. King, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. T.J. King reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 5 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 67.3 |
Related Context
T.J. King played TE for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, T.J. King recorded 7 receiving yards and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
7
Efficiency
46.7
Usage
6.7
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/3 | @ UAB | L 3-52 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 7 | 46.7 | 6.7 | 7 |
#1 Featured game
@ UAB
Week 10 · L 3-52 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7
Receiving Yards
56.3 takeover
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#2
vs New Mexico
Week 1 · L 20-23 · Postseason
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
vs Charlotte
Week 13 · W 33-14 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
vs North Texas
Week 9 · W 31-17 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
vs Southern Miss
Week 6 · W 55-32 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · UTSA
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
67.3
7 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 6.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.