Usage Score
8.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTSA
Andrew Martel
LB • 6'1" • 220 lbs • Richmond, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Andrew Martel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.2
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
16.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTSA
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Martel, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTSA. Andrew Martel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTSA paired 0 primary output with 4.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 35.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
35.2
Usage
8.5
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Baylor: 0. Army: 0. North Texas: 1. UTEP: 0. UAB: 0. Rice: 0. Texas A&M: 2.5. Old Dominion: 1.5. Southern Miss: 1. Florida Atlantic: 0. Louisiana Tech: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Baylor: 3 by 12.5. Army: 10 by 41.7. North Texas: 10 by 51.7. UTEP: 7 by 29.2. UAB: 7 by 29.2. Rice: 5 by 20.8. Texas A&M: 7 by 54.2. Old Dominion: 8 by 48.3. Southern Miss: 7 by 39.2. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 20.8. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 57.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=3 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=8 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · n=6 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=6 · +1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Louisiana TechSplash game | L 27-41 | 9 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 26-40 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Southern Miss | L 17-36 | 7 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Old Dominion | W 24-23 | 8 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-45 | 7 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Rice | W 31-27 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | L 14-33 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | @ UTEP | W 26-16 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ North Texas10+ tackles | L 3-45 | 10 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Army10+ tackles | L 13-31 | 10 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor | L 14-63 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 4.6 | 0.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 3 | 12.6 | 3.4 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 6 | 21.7 | 5.6 | 3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 8 | 35.2 | 8.5 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.7 takeover score.
#2
Baylor
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
#4
Rice
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#5
Kansas State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
0 primary output · 4.6 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
16.8
8 primary · 35.2 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
11.7
6 primary · 21.7 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8006
Foster · Richmond, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
160
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.