Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019North Texas
TE • 6'2" • 254 lbs • Spring, TX, USA
Kelvin Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.1
Efficiency
45.5
Consistency
53.8
Season Value
35.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kelvin Smith, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · North Texas. Kelvin Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
North Texas paired 270 primary output with 60.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 45.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
12.7
Efficiency
45.5
Usage
8.1
Consistency
53.8
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 13. California: 9. UTSA: 10. Middle Tennessee: 17. Charlotte: 29. Rice: 5. UAB: 6
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 2 by 43.3. California: 2 by 30. UTSA: 1 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 56.7. Charlotte: 4 by 48.3. Rice: 1 by 33.3. UAB: 1 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs UTSA
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 79 | 65 | 7.5 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 264 | 56.2 | 9.4 | 185 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 264 | 56.2 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 270 | 60.6 | 9.5 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 270 | 60.6 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 89 | 45.5 | 8.1 | -181 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
41
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 48.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · North Texas
270 primary output · 60.6 efficiency · 9.5 usage
55.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · North Texas
55.9
270 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · North Texas
51.2
264 primary · 56.2 efficiency · 9.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8319
Martin · Arlington, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
702
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kelvin Smith quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit