Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
North Texas paired 1,437 primary output with 54 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 10 | 1,437 | 1,010 | 427 | 10 | 65.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
North Texas paired 1,437 primary output with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
143.7
Efficiency
54
Usage
25.7
Consistency
50.4
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 5. Southern Miss: 77. Portland State: 58. Western Kentucky: 350. Marshall: 144. UTSA: 241. Louisiana Tech: 279. Tennessee: 97. Middle Tennessee: 116. UTEP: 70
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 37.5. Southern Miss: 17 by 38.9. Portland State: 8 by 74.7. Western Kentucky: 51 by 66.9. Marshall: 51 by 42.5. UTSA: 36 by 71.8. Louisiana Tech: 59 by 55.5. Tennessee: 36 by 45.6. Middle Tennessee: 24 by 56.5. UTEP: 20 by 50.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.