Usage Score
17.3
Player Dossier
2015-2018Middle Tennessee
Patrick Smith
WR • 6'0" • 187 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Patrick Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.1
Consistency
61
Season Value
59.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
1516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Patrick Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 565 primary output with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
40.4
Efficiency
59.1
Usage
17.3
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 39. Vanderbilt: -3. Unknown: 87. Georgia: 77. Florida Atlantic: 89. Marshall: 26. Florida International: 19. Charlotte: 3. Old Dominion: 44. Western Kentucky: 60. UTEP: 31. Kentucky: 38. UAB: 13. UAB: 42
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 3 by 86.7. Vanderbilt: 1 by 0. Unknown: 5 by 100. Georgia: 9 by 57. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 43.3. Florida International: 3 by 42.2. Charlotte: 1 by 20. Old Dominion: 4 by 73.3. Western Kentucky: 8 by 50. UTEP: 2 by 100. Kentucky: 6 by 42.2. UAB: 2 by 43.3. UAB: 4 by 70
Split Comparison
Wins38 · n=7 · +2.7 vs Losses
Losses35.3 · n=6 · -2.7 vs Wins
First Half47.7 · n=7 · +14.7 vs Second Half
Second Half33 · n=7 · -14.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/16 | @ App State | L 13-45 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs UAB | L 25-27 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs UAB | W 27-3 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Kentucky | L 23-34 | — | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UTEP | W 48-32 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Western KentuckyHigh volume | W 29-10 | — | 8 | 60 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Old Dominion | W 51-17 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Charlotte | W 21-13 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Florida International | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 10/5 | @ Marshall | W 34-24 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 25-24 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ GeorgiaHigh volume | L 7-49 | — | 9 | 77 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 3 | 33 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-35 | — | 1 | -3 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 332 | 74.1 | 9.7 | 332 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 329 | 65.1 | 12.9 | -3 |
| 2018 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 565 | 59.1 | 17.3 | 236 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 565 | 59.1 | 17.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
56
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 57 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
565 primary output · 59.1 efficiency · 17.3 usage
59.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
59.4
565 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 17.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
51.4
329 primary · 65.1 efficiency · 12.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.7783
Fleming Island · Orange Park, FL
- Committed To
- Navy
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,226
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.