Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2016-2019Middle Tennessee
DE • 6'3" • 242 lbs • Fairburn, GA, USA
Trae Philpots shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.7
Efficiency
20.2
Consistency
40.5
Season Value
18.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trae Philpots, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Trae Philpots shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.2 disruption score.
Trae Philpots played DE for Middle Tennessee. Across 4 tracked seasons, Trae Philpots recorded 97 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
20.2
Usage
5.7
Consistency
40.5
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 1. Unknown: 1. Duke: 0. Iowa: 0. Marshall: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. North Texas: 0.5. Florida International: 0. Charlotte: 0.5. Rice: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 6 by 35. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Duke: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 3 by 12.5. Marshall: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 20.8. North Texas: 5 by 25.8. Florida International: 4 by 16.7. Charlotte: 5 by 25.8. Rice: 5 by 25.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
35 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/16 | vs Rice | L 28-31 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Charlotte | L 20-34 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Florida International | W 50-17 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ North Texas | L 30-33 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 13-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Marshall | W 24-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Iowa | L 3-48 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Duke | L 18-41 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Michigan | L 21-40 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 1 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 1 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 13 | 24.1 | 8.1 | 12 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 13 | 24.1 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 3.5 | 20.2 | 5.7 | -9.5 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#3
Marshall
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44 takeover score.
#5
Florida International
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2016 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
23.6
13 primary · 24.1 efficiency · 8.1 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7533
Creekside · Fairburn, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
97
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.