Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 3,241 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 6 | 474 | 412 | 62 | 4 | 35.7 |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 13 | 238 | 216 | 22 | 4 | 73.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 13 | 3,114 | 2,758 | 356 | 18 | 73.1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 13 | 301 | 285 | 16 | 2 | 70.6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 13 | 3,012 | 2,874 | 138 | 16 | 70.6 |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 11 | 197 | 163 | 34 | 2 | 75.3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 11 | 3,044 | 2,814 | 230 | 20 | 75.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 3,241 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 63.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 335 yards of offense and 63.2 efficiency. It landed in the 63.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
294.6
Efficiency
63.6
Usage
24
Consistency
87.8
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 197. Texas: 339. Grambling: 245. Bowling Green: 259. Florida International: 353. Rice: 213. Massachusetts: 308. Southern Miss: 347. UTEP: 338. North Texas: 307. UTSA: 335
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 38 by 53.7. Texas: 56 by 57.2. Grambling: 33 by 68.1. Bowling Green: 35 by 64.7. Florida International: 51 by 69.5. Rice: 45 by 50.9. Massachusetts: 33 by 82.1. Southern Miss: 33 by 66.5. UTEP: 39 by 65.8. North Texas: 54 by 57.5. UTSA: 50 by 63.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.