Usage Score
4.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Louisiana Tech
Collin Scott
LB • 6'0" • 231 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Collin Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.8
Consistency
7.7
Season Value
9.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
16161717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Collin Scott, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Collin Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 13.5 primary output with 41.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 22.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
22.8
Usage
4.8
Consistency
7.7
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. Texas: 0. Unknown: 1. Bowling Green: 1. Florida International: 0. Rice: 0.5. Massachusetts: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTEP: 0. North Texas: 0. Marshall: 0. UAB: 0. UTSA: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 9 by 37.5. Unknown: 9 by 47.5. Bowling Green: 4 by 26.7. Florida International: 6 by 25. Rice: 6 by 30. Massachusetts: 3 by 12.5. Southern Miss: 6 by 25. UTEP: 6 by 25. North Texas: 5 by 20.8. Marshall: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.2 · n=9 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=6 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | @ Miami | W 14-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTSA | W 41-27 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ UAB | L 14-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Marshall | L 10-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs North Texas | W 52-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 42-21 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Southern Miss | W 45-30 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Massachusetts | W 69-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Rice | W 23-20 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Florida International | W 43-31 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Bowling Green | W 35-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Texas | L 14-45 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1 | 9.5 | 1.2 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1 | 9.5 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1 | 9.9 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1 | 9.9 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 13.5 | 41.4 | 11.3 | 12.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 2.5 | 22.8 | 4.8 | -11 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 2.5 | 22.8 | 4.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64.3 takeover score.
#2
Western Kentucky
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#4
Rice
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
#5
Bowling Green
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
13.5 primary output · 41.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
28.8
#2
2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
9.6
2.5 primary · 22.8 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
9.6
2.5 primary · 22.8 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8007
Manvel · Manvel, TX
- Committed To
- Louisiana Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
177
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.