Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 810 primary output with 55.8 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 7 | 32 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 15.4 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 8 | 288 | 262 | 26 | 2 | 34.9 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 11 | 123 | 60 | 63 | 1 | 71.1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 11 | 687 | 610 | 77 | 9 | 71.1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 6 | 272 | 207 | 65 | 2 | 48.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 810 primary output with 55.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with 96 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
45.3
Efficiency
51.7
Usage
14.4
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 43. Grambling: 49. Bowling Green: 55. Florida International: 96. Rice: 17. Massachusetts: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 9 by 42.2. Grambling: 5 by 90.8. Bowling Green: 11 by 45.1. Florida International: 21 by 45.9. Rice: 4 by 44.3. Massachusetts: 3 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.