Usage Score
6.3
Player Dossier
2015-2018Louisiana Tech
DT • 6'2" • 280 lbs • Bay St. Louis, MS, USA
Jordan Bradford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.3
Efficiency
24.5
Consistency
35.5
Season Value
21.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Bradford, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Jordan Bradford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.5 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 9 primary output with 24.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 24.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
24.5
Usage
6.3
Consistency
35.5
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 2.5. Unknown: 1. LSU: 0. North Texas: 3. UAB: 0. UTSA: 1. UTEP: 1. Florida Atlantic: 0. Rice: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Western Kentucky: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 9 by 62.5. Unknown: 7 by 39.2. LSU: 6 by 25. North Texas: 3 by 42.5. UAB: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 2 by 18.3. UTEP: 3 by 22.5. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 3 by 12.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 5 by 25.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Alabama
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Western Kentucky | L 15-30 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Southern Miss | L 20-21 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Rice | W 28-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/26 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 21-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs UTEP | W 31-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ UTSA | W 31-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UAB | L 7-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ North TexasSplash game | W 29-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ LSU | L 21-38 | 6 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ South Alabama | W 30-26 | 9 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 7 | 17 | 5 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 7 | 17 | 5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 6.5 | 18.6 | 5.2 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 6.5 | 18.6 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 9 | 24.5 | 6.3 | 2.5 |
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.9 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#4
Western Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#5
Western Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
9 primary output · 24.5 efficiency · 6.3 usage
21.7
#2
2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
19
7 primary · 17 efficiency · 5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
19
7 primary · 17 efficiency · 5 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8015
St Stanislaus · Bay St. Louis, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
109
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Bradford quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit