Usage Score
30.4
Player Dossier
2015-2019Florida International
Anthony Jones
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Anthony Jones leans workhorse runner traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
48.7
Consistency
55.7
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Florida International
15161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Florida International
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Jones, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Florida International. Anthony Jones leans workhorse runner traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Florida International paired 976 primary output with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 163 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Florida International
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
81.3
Efficiency
48.7
Usage
30.4
Consistency
55.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 65. Tulane: 51. Western Kentucky: 43. Unknown: 52. Louisiana Tech: 59. Massachusetts: 136. Charlotte: 122. UTEP: 163. Middle Tennessee: 87. Old Dominion: 25. Miami: 117. Marshall: 56
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 21 by 32.2. Tulane: 15 by 35.6. Western Kentucky: 11 by 40.7. Unknown: 17 by 31.9. Louisiana Tech: 12 by 44.8. Massachusetts: 22 by 61.7. Charlotte: 17 by 75.6. UTEP: 16 by 84.9. Middle Tennessee: 21 by 43.2. Old Dominion: 9 by 28.9. Miami: 17 by 72.4. Marshall: 18 by 32.1
Split Comparison
Wins112.6 · n=5 · +52.4 vs Losses
Losses60.2 · n=6 · -52.4 vs Wins
First Half67.7 · n=6 · -27.3 vs Second Half
Second Half95 · n=6 · +27.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
84.9 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Arkansas State | L 26-34 | 21 | 65 | 3.10 | 0 | — | — | 3.1 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Marshall | L 27-30 | 17 | 52 | 3.10 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3.1 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Miami100 rush yards | W 30-24 | 16 | 112 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6.9 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Old Dominion | W 24-17 | 9 | 25 | 2.80 | 0 | — | — | 2.8 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 17-50 | 21 | 87 | 4.10 | 0 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 32-17 | 15 | 102 | 6.80 | 1 | 1 | 61 | 10.2 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Charlotte100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 48-23 | 16 | 117 | 7.30 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 7.2 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Massachusetts100 rush yards | W 44-0 | 20 | 115 | 5.80 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 6.2 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Louisiana Tech2+ TD | L 31-43 | 9 | 35 | 3.90 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 17 | 52 | 3.10 | 0 | — | — | 3.1 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-20 | 11 | 43 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Tulane | L 14-42 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida International
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Florida International | 265 | 44.5 | 9.2 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Florida International | 651 | 39.4 | 19 | 386 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Florida International | 0 | — | — | -651 |
| 2018 Postseason | Florida International | 372 | 49.8 | 22.5 | 372 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Florida International | 372 | 49.8 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Florida International | 976 | 48.7 | 30.4 | 604 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Florida International | 976 | 48.7 | 30.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with 163 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
163
Primary metric
163 scrimmage yards and 39 usage.
#2
Marshall
132
Primary metric
Win with 132 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
132 scrimmage yards and 30.5 usage.
#3
UTEP
128
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
128 scrimmage yards and 30.8 usage.
#4
Toledo
92
Primary metric
Win with 92 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
92 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#5
Marshall
73
Primary metric
Loss with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 36.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Florida International
976 primary output · 48.7 efficiency · 30.4 usage
58.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Florida International
58.7
976 primary · 48.7 efficiency · 30.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Florida International
45.5
372 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8226
Miami Central · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Florida International
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,264
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.