Player Stats

Bryan Wright College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
198
TFL
28.5
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
13
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonCincinnati82840--024.7
2017 Regular SeasonCincinnati6152.50-2039
2018 PostseasonCincinnati1350.50.5--054.2
2018 Regular SeasonCincinnati135084.56-054.2
2019 PostseasonCincinnati14430-1083
2019 Regular SeasonCincinnati149610.53.574083

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 29 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 50.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

2.1

Efficiency

50.5

Usage

13.4

Consistency

81.6

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 4. UCLA: 2. Ohio State: 2. Miami (OH): 2.5. Marshall: 2. UCF: 2. Houston: 2. Tulsa: 1. East Carolina: 0.5. UConn: 2. South Florida: 2. Temple: 3. Memphis: 2. Memphis: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 4 by 56.7. UCLA: 7 by 49.2. Ohio State: 4 by 36.7. Miami (OH): 5 by 45.8. Marshall: 3 by 32.5. UCF: 6 by 45. Houston: 4 by 36.7. Tulsa: 12 by 60. East Carolina: 9 by 42.5. UConn: 11 by 65.8. South Florida: 9 by 57.5. Temple: 7 by 59.2. Memphis: 8 by 53.3. Memphis: 11 by 65.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.1 · Games = 11 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 3 · -0.1 vs Wins