Usage Score
23.7
Player Dossier
2015-2018Cincinnati
Kahlil Lewis
WR • 6'0" • 197 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kahlil Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
34.5
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
151516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kahlil Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Kahlil Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 676 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
60.2
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
23.7
Consistency
34.5
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 14. UCLA: 7. Miami (OH): 13. Unknown: 92. Ohio: 51. UConn: 30. Tulane: 40. Temple: 7. SMU: 174. Navy: 39. South Florida: 37. UCF: 75. East Carolina: 203
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 1 by 93.3. UCLA: 3 by 15.6. Miami (OH): 1 by 86.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Ohio: 5 by 68. UConn: 2 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 88.9. Temple: 1 by 46.7. SMU: 12 by 96.7. Navy: 5 by 52. South Florida: 5 by 49.3. UCF: 5 by 100. East Carolina: 9 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60.8 · n=10 · +19.8 vs Losses
Losses41 · n=2 · -19.8 vs Wins
First Half35.3 · n=7 · -53.9 vs Second Half
Second Half89.2 · n=6 · +53.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Virginia Tech | W 35-31 | — | 1 | 14 | 30 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-6 | — | 9 | 203 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 3 | 57 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ UCF | L 13-38 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs South Florida | W 35-23 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Navy | W 42-0 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ SMU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-20 | — | 12 | 174 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Temple | L 17-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Tulane2+ TD | W 37-21 | — | 3 | 40 | 10.8 | 13.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UConn | W 49-7 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Ohio | W 34-30 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 92 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 61 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Miami (OH) | W 21-0 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ UCLA | W 26-17 | — | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 2.30 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 53 | 100 | 11.1 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 53 | 100 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 605 | 81.6 | 19.6 | 552 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 676 | 69.8 | 24.4 | 71 |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 782 | 76.7 | 23.7 | 106 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 782 | 76.7 | 23.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 90.9 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
203
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
203 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
174
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Temple
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
676 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 24.4 usage
62.8
#2
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
58.7
782 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 23.7 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Cincinnati
58.7
782 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 23.7 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9884
Lakeland · Lakeland, FL
- Committed To
- Colorado
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,116
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.