Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
USC paired 25 primary output with 38.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 4 | 5 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 38.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | USC | 10 | 35 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 6 | - | 0 | 75.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | USC | 8 | 33 | 5.5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 46.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | USC | 9 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 31.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | USC | 9 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 31.4 |
| 2020 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
USC paired 25 primary output with 38.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 16 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
16
Usage
5.5
Consistency
37.9
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 0.5. Fresno State: 3. Stanford: 1. Utah: 0. Washington: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Oregon: 0. Arizona State: 1. UCLA: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 3 by 17.5. Fresno State: 4 by 46.7. Stanford: 1 by 14.2. Utah: 3 by 12.5. Washington: 1 by 4.2. Notre Dame: 2 by 8.3. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 2 by 18.3. UCLA: 0 by 10
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.