Usage Score
6.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018USC
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Lafayette, CA, USA
Tyler Petite reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.8
Efficiency
42.5
Consistency
79.7
Season Value
34.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · USC
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Petite, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · USC. Tyler Petite reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
USC paired 307 primary output with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
7.5
Efficiency
42.5
Usage
6.8
Consistency
79.7
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 8. Texas: 9. Arizona: 10. Utah: 3
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 1 by 53.3. Texas: 2 by 30. Arizona: 1 by 66.7. Utah: 1 by 20
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Arizona
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
USC
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | USC | 145 | 64.4 | 7.3 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 145 | 64.4 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 156 | 66.7 | 6.2 | 11 |
| 2017 Postseason | USC | 307 | 64.6 | 9.1 | 151 |
| 2017 Regular Season | USC | 307 | 64.6 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | USC | 30 | 42.5 | 6.8 | -277 |
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · USC
307 primary output · 64.6 efficiency · 9.1 usage
56.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · USC
56.6
307 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · USC
48.1
145 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 7.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9155
Campolindo · Moraga, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
638
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tyler Petite quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit