Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2015-2018USC
Isaiah Langley
CB • 6'0" • 175 lbs • Hayward, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Isaiah Langley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.9
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
24.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · USC
151616171718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Langley, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · USC. Isaiah Langley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
USC paired 0 primary output with 6.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · USC
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20.9
Usage
3.7
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 0. Stanford: 1. Texas: 2. Arizona: 0. Colorado: 0. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 1. UCLA: 1. Notre Dame: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 3 by 12.5. Stanford: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 1 by 24.2. Arizona: 3 by 12.5. Colorado: 6 by 25. Utah: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 5 by 30.8. Notre Dame: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=3 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · n=6 · +1.2 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=5 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=4 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
30.8 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs Notre Dame | L 17-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ UCLA | L 27-34 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Arizona State | L 35-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/21 | @ Utah | L 28-41 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/14 | vs Colorado | W 31-20 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Arizona | W 24-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ Texas | L 14-37 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Stanford | L 3-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs UNLV | W 43-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016201720172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 0 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | USC | 6 | 19.9 | 2.8 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | USC | 6 | 19.9 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | USC | 7 | 20.9 | 3.7 | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#2
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#3
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
#4
Arizona
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.4 takeover score.
#5
UCLA
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · USC
0 primary output · 6.7 efficiency · 1.3 usage
36
#2
2016 Regular Season · USC
36
0 primary · 6.7 efficiency · 1.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · USC
24.4
7 primary · 20.9 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9556
Foothill · Pleasanton, CA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
72
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.