Player Stats

Darrin Hall College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,455
Rushing yards
2,188
Receiving yards
267
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonPittsburgh10220029.9
2015 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1028525530229.9
2016 PostseasonPittsburgh9770040.3
2016 Regular SeasonPittsburgh916715314040.3
2017 Regular SeasonPittsburgh127856281571050.4
2018 PostseasonPittsburgh141291236172.1
2018 Regular SeasonPittsburgh141,0801,02060972.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Pittsburgh paired 1,209 primary output with 64 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 64 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Win with 233 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

86.4

Efficiency

64

Usage

22.5

Consistency

60.2

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 129. UAlbany: 22. Penn State: 32. Georgia Tech: 35. North Carolina: 81. UCF: 44. Syracuse: 107. Notre Dame: 82. Duke: 77. Virginia: 233. Virginia Tech: 186. Wake Forest: 57. Miami: 42. Clemson: 82

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 17 by 79.7. UAlbany: 4 by 57.3. Penn State: 8 by 41.7. Georgia Tech: 8 by 44.1. North Carolina: 7 by 98.2. UCF: 7 by 65.5. Syracuse: 17 by 65.6. Notre Dame: 13 by 69.3. Duke: 14 by 48.4. Virginia: 20 by 98.5. Virginia Tech: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 16 by 36. Miami: 16 by 30.1. Clemson: 15 by 61.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins102.4 · Games = 7 · +32.1 vs Losses
Losses70.3 · Games = 7 · -32.1 vs Wins