Usage Score
22.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018Pittsburgh
Darrin Hall
RB • 5'11" • 225 lbs • Youngstown, OH, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Darrin Hall leans balanced backfield option traits and 64 efficiency.
Efficiency
64
Consistency
60.2
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh
15151616171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darrin Hall, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Darrin Hall leans balanced backfield option traits and 64 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 1,209 primary output with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win with 233 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
86.4
Efficiency
64
Usage
22.5
Consistency
60.2
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 129. Unknown: 22. Penn State: 32. Georgia Tech: 35. North Carolina: 81. UCF: 44. Syracuse: 107. Notre Dame: 82. Duke: 77. Virginia: 233. Virginia Tech: 186. Wake Forest: 57. Miami: 42. Clemson: 82
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 17 by 79.7. Unknown: 4 by 57.3. Penn State: 8 by 41.7. Georgia Tech: 8 by 44.1. North Carolina: 7 by 98.2. UCF: 7 by 65.5. Syracuse: 17 by 65.6. Notre Dame: 13 by 69.3. Duke: 14 by 48.4. Virginia: 20 by 98.5. Virginia Tech: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 16 by 36. Miami: 16 by 30.1. Clemson: 15 by 61.2
Split Comparison
Wins115.8 · n=6 · +45.5 vs Losses
Losses70.3 · n=7 · -45.5 vs Wins
First Half64.3 · n=7 · -44.1 vs Second Half
Second Half108.4 · n=7 · +44.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | vs Stanford100 rush yards | L 13-14 | 16 | 123 | 7.70 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7.6 |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Clemson | L 10-42 | 14 | 86 | 6.10 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 5.5 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Miami | L 3-24 | 15 | 46 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 2.6 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Wake Forest | W 34-13 | 13 | 44 | 3.40 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Virginia Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-22 | 7 | 186 | 26.60 | 1 | — | — | 26.6 |
| Fri 11/2 | @ Virginia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 23-13 | 19 | 229 | 12.10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11.7 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Duke | W 54-45 | 13 | 53 | 4.10 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-19 | 9 | 62 | 6.90 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6.3 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Syracuse100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 44-37 | 17 | 107 | 6.30 | 2 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UCF | L 14-45 | 7 | 44 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ North Carolina | L 35-38 | 6 | 84 | 14 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 11.6 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Tech | W 24-19 | 7 | 29 | 4.10 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.4 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Penn State | L 6-51 | 7 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 22 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201520162016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 287 | 30.8 | 13.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 287 | 30.8 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 174 | 51.9 | 7.4 | -113 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 174 | 51.9 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 785 | 46.1 | 21 | 611 |
| 2018 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,209 | 64 | 22.5 | 424 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,209 | 64 | 22.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Win with 233 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
233
Primary metric
233 scrimmage yards and 41.7 usage.
#2
Duke
258
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
258 scrimmage yards and 38.5 usage.
#3
Miami
103
Primary metric
Loss with 103 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
103 scrimmage yards and 27.3 usage.
#4
Virginia Tech
186
Primary metric
Win with 186 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
186 scrimmage yards and 16.3 usage.
#5
Penn State
33
Primary metric
Win with 33 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
33 scrimmage yards and 6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh
1,209 primary output · 64 efficiency · 22.5 usage
61.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
61.7
1,209 primary · 64 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
42.4
785 primary · 46.1 efficiency · 21 usage
Milestones
8
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9005
Fitch · Youngstown, OH
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,455
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.