Usage / Role
18%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2016Colorado
DE • 6'3" • Roseville, CA, USA
Jordan Carrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.3 disruption score.
Usage / Role
18%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
21
Developing production for an edge defender
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
27
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Colorado
Snapshot
Player Story
Jordan Carrell built his college career from 2015 through 2016 as a defensive end from Roseville, CA wearing No. 92, spending time with Colorado. The clearest part of Jordan Carrell's career was his defensive...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Jordan Carrell, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Colorado. Jordan Carrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.3 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado | 13 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 50.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 13 | 44 | 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 0 | 50.6 |
Related Context
Jordan Carrell played DE for Colorado. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jordan Carrell recorded 47 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Colorado.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Colorado paired 12 primary output with 24.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
24.3
Usage
7.6
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 0. Colorado State: 1. Idaho State: 2. Michigan: 0. Oregon: 3. Oregon State: 0. USC: 0. Arizona State: 0. Stanford: 2. Arizona: 2. Washington State: 0. Utah: 2. Washington: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 3 by 12.5. Colorado State: 3 by 22.5. Idaho State: 2 by 28.3. Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Oregon: 5 by 50.8. Oregon State: 4 by 16.7. USC: 7 by 29.2. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Stanford: 4 by 36.7. Arizona: 3 by 32.5. Washington State: 2 by 8.3. Utah: 3 by 32.5. Washington: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Oklahoma State | L 8-38 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Washington | L 10-41 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs UtahSplash game | W 27-22 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Washington State | W 38-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ ArizonaSplash game | W 49-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ StanfordSplash game | W 10-5 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Arizona State | W 40-16 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ USC | L 17-21 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oregon State | W 47-6 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ OregonSplash game | W 41-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Michigan | L 28-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Idaho StateSplash game | W 56-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Colorado State | W 44-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Jordan Carrell built his college career from 2015 through 2016 as a defensive end from Roseville, CA wearing No. 92, spending time with Colorado. The clearest part of Jordan Carrell's career was his defensive production: 47 tackles, 6 tackles for loss, and 5 sacks across 13 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Colorado. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Jordan Carrell's production has multiple signals. With 13 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Colorado.
The arc is straightforward: Jordan Carrell moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado | 12 | 24.3 | 7.6 | 12 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 12 | 24.3 | 7.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Oregon
Week 4 · W 41-38 · Conference game
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Havoc Plays
83.6 takeover
3 disruption/tackle impact with 83.6 takeover score.
#2
@ Stanford
Week 8 · W 10-5 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
67.8 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 67.8 takeover score.
#3
@ Arizona
Week 11 · W 49-24 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
66.4 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#4
vs Idaho State
Week 2 · W 56-7
2
Havoc Plays
65 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#5
vs Utah
Week 13 · W 27-22 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
58.9 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Colorado
12 primary output · 24.3 efficiency · 7.6 usage
50.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
50.6
12 primary · 24.3 efficiency · 7.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Colorado
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.