Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Arizona State
George Lea
DL • 6'3" • 284 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
George Lea shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.5
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
23.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
1617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Lea, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State. George Lea shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.5 disruption score.
George Lea played DL for Arizona State. Across 4 tracked seasons, George Lea recorded 68 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Arizona State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 3.5 primary output with 14.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Arizona State
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
19.5
Usage
7.9
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 0. Unknown: 1. Michigan State: 0. Colorado: 0.5. California: 2. Washington State: 0.5. Utah: 0. UCLA: 2. USC: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Michigan State: 2 by 8.3. Colorado: 3 by 17.5. California: 4 by 36.7. Washington State: 3 by 17.5. Utah: 4 by 16.7. UCLA: 1 by 24.2. USC: 4 by 31.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs California
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/9 | vs USC | L 26-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ UCLA | L 32-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Utah | L 3-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Washington State | W 38-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ California | W 24-17 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Colorado | L 31-34 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Michigan State | W 10-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Kent State | W 30-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 3.5 | 14.2 | 6.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 2.5 | 14.6 | 4.1 | -1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 3 | 14.5 | 4.4 | 0.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 3 | 14.5 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 7.5 | 19.5 | 7.9 | 4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5
Primary metric
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.2 takeover score.
#2
California
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.7 takeover score.
#3
Utah
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#4
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.7 takeover score.
#5
Washington
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
3.5 primary output · 14.2 efficiency · 6.4 usage
24.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Arizona State
23.6
7.5 primary · 19.5 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Arizona State
14.7
2.5 primary · 14.6 efficiency · 4.1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8572
Landry-Walker · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
68
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.