Usage Score
29.1
Player Dossier
2015-2016Oklahoma
Dede Westbrook
WR • 6'0" • Cameron, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Dede Westbrook reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.2
Consistency
67
Season Value
70.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Oklahoma
15151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dede Westbrook, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Oklahoma. Dede Westbrook reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 1,524 primary output with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
117.2
Efficiency
88.2
Usage
29.1
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 59. Houston: 70. UL Monroe: 33. Ohio State: 51. TCU: 158. Texas: 232. Kansas State: 184. Texas Tech: 202. Kansas: 105. Iowa State: 131. Baylor: 88. West Virginia: 100. Oklahoma State: 111
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 6 by 65.6. Houston: 8 by 58.3. UL Monroe: 4 by 55. Ohio State: 5 by 68. TCU: 7 by 100. Texas: 10 by 100. Kansas State: 9 by 100. Texas Tech: 9 by 100. Kansas: 5 by 100. Iowa State: 7 by 100. Baylor: 4 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 100. Oklahoma State: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins127.5 · n=11 · +67.0 vs Losses
Losses60.5 · n=2 · -67.0 vs Wins
First Half112.4 · n=7 · -10.4 vs Second Half
Second Half122.8 · n=6 · +10.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/3 | vs Auburn | W 35-19 | — | 6 | 59 | 8.4 | 9.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | W 38-20 | — | 4 | 111 | 27.8 | 27.80 | 1 | 69 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards | W 56-28 | — | 2 | 100 | 25.3 | 50 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Baylor2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 4 | 88 | 18.6 | 22 | 2 | 40 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards | W 34-24 | — | 7 | 131 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kansas100 receiving yards | W 56-3 | — | 5 | 105 | 21.5 | 21 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 66-59 | — | 9 | 202 | 21.7 | 22.40 | 2 | 52 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Kansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-17 | — | 9 | 184 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 3 | 88 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-40 | — | 10 | 232 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 3 | 71 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TCU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-46 | — | 7 | 158 | 20.3 | 22.60 | 2 | 67 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Ohio State | L 24-45 | — | 5 | 51 | 14.3 | 10.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UL Monroe | W 59-17 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ HoustonHigh volume | L 23-33 | — | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Oklahoma | 743 | 90.5 | 16.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 743 | 90.5 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,524 | 88.2 | 29.1 | 781 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,524 | 88.2 | 29.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
232
Primary metric
232 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
West Virginia
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
202
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
202 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
184
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas State
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma
1,524 primary output · 88.2 efficiency · 29.1 usage
70.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Oklahoma
70.4
1,524 primary · 88.2 efficiency · 29.1 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Oklahoma
56.5
743 primary · 90.5 efficiency · 16.2 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8342
Cameron Yoe · Cameron, TX
- Committed To
- Texas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,267
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.