Player Stats

Neville Gallimore College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
143
TFL
18
Sacks
9
QB hurries
18
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonOklahoma111-0--031.9
2016 Regular SeasonOklahoma1139413-031.9
2017 Regular SeasonOklahoma8231.5141035.1
2018 PostseasonOklahoma134-0--050.6
2018 Regular SeasonOklahoma1346534-050.6
2019 PostseasonOklahoma143-0--057.6
2019 Regular SeasonOklahoma14277.5471057.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 19.5 primary output with 22.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 22.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

22.9

Usage

6.4

Consistency

54.7

Best Game by takeover score

Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Houston: 2. South Dakota: 2. UCLA: 0. Texas Tech: 2. Kansas: 1. Texas: 4. West Virginia: 0.5. Kansas State: 0. Iowa State: 2. Baylor: 2. TCU: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Baylor: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 1 by 24.2. South Dakota: 3 by 32.5. UCLA: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 3 by 32.5. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 4 by 56.7. West Virginia: 3 by 17.5. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 1 by 24.2. Baylor: 2 by 28.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 2 by 38.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 12 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -1.6 vs Wins