Usage Score
4.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Oklahoma
Neville Gallimore
DL • 6'2" • 301 lbs • St. Catharines, ON, CAN
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Neville Gallimore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
17.9
Consistency
44.7
Season Value
23.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
16161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Neville Gallimore, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oklahoma. Neville Gallimore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 12.5 primary output with 17.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
17.9
Usage
4.8
Consistency
44.7
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Houston: 2. Unknown: 1. UCLA: 0. Texas Tech: 0. Kansas: 1. Texas: 4. West Virginia: 0.5. Kansas State: 0. Iowa State: 0. Baylor: 1. TCU: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Baylor: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 1 by 24.2. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. UCLA: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 3 by 12.5. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 4 by 56.7. West Virginia: 3 by 17.5. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 1 by 4.2. Baylor: 2 by 18.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.0 · n=11 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=2 · -1.0 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=7 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ LSU | L 28-63 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Baylor | W 30-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Oklahoma State | W 34-16 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs TCU | W 28-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Baylor | W 34-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Iowa State | W 42-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kansas State | L 41-48 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs West Virginia | W 52-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Texas2+ sacks · Splash game | W 34-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Kansas | W 45-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Texas Tech | W 55-16 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/15 | @ UCLA | W 48-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Houston | W 49-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma | 5 | 19.7 | 5.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 5 | 19.7 | 5.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 3.5 | 16.4 | 3.8 | -1.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma | 8 | 22.2 | 5.9 | 4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 8 | 22.2 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 12.5 | 17.9 | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 12.5 | 17.9 | 4.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.
#2
Texas
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#4
Texas Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
12.5 primary output · 17.9 efficiency · 4.8 usage
23.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Oklahoma
23.5
12.5 primary · 17.9 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
14.5
8 primary · 22.2 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9643
Canada Prep Football Academy · St. Catharines, ON
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
143
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.