Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Tennessee
Kyle Phillips
DL • 6'4" • 273 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kyle Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.4
Consistency
36.1
Season Value
27.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Tennessee
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Phillips, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Tennessee. Kyle Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 16 primary output with 32.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 32.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Tennessee
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
32.4
Usage
12.1
Consistency
36.1
Best Game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 0. Unknown: 1. UTEP: 0. Florida: 2. Georgia: 0. Auburn: 1. Alabama: 1. South Carolina: 2. Charlotte: 5. Kentucky: 0.5. Missouri: 2.5. Vanderbilt: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. UTEP: 3 by 12.5. Florida: 3 by 32.5. Georgia: 7 by 29.2. Auburn: 9 by 47.5. Alabama: 2 by 18.3. South Carolina: 6 by 45. Charlotte: 4 by 66.7. Kentucky: 6 by 30. Missouri: 7 by 54.2. Vanderbilt: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 4 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 6 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Vanderbilt | L 13-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Missouri | L 17-50 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Kentucky | W 24-7 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs CharlotteSplash game | W 14-3 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ South Carolina | L 24-27 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Alabama | L 21-58 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Auburn | W 30-24 | 9 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Georgia | L 12-38 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Florida | L 21-47 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UTEP | W 24-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs West Virginia | L 14-40 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4 | 17.1 | 3.2 | 4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tennessee | 8.5 | 20.2 | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tennessee | 16 | 32.4 | 12.1 | 7.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.1 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
#3
Missouri
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#4
Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.2 takeover score.
#5
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Tennessee
16 primary output · 32.4 efficiency · 12.1 usage
27.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tennessee
17.2
4 primary · 17.1 efficiency · 3.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
12.9
8.5 primary · 20.2 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9843
Hillsboro · Nashville, TN
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
103
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.