Player Stats

Chase Harrell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
336
Receptions
33
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonKansas0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonKansas0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonKansas3581249.4
2017 Regular SeasonKansas1025221366.7
2019 Regular SeasonArkansas3334148.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Kansas paired 221 primary output with 61.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kansas, Arkansas.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Portland State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Arkansas

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

11.3

Efficiency

75.5

Usage

7.2

Consistency

77.8

Best Game by takeover score

Portland State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Portland State: 14. Colorado State: 14. Mississippi State: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Portland State: 1 by 93.3. Colorado State: 1 by 93.3. Mississippi State: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins14 · Games = 2 · +8 vs Losses
Losses6 · Games = 1 · -8 vs Wins