Player Stats

Roy Helu Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,905
Rushing yards
3,404
Receiving yards
501
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonNebraska724920940038
2008 PostseasonNebraska13-1-10061.2
2008 Regular SeasonNebraska131,070804266761.2
2009 PostseasonNebraska14880078.9
2009 Regular SeasonNebraska141,2881,1391491078.9
2010 PostseasonNebraska1434340073.3
2010 Regular SeasonNebraska141,2571,211461173.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Nebraska paired 1,296 primary output with 50.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 63.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Nebraska

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

92.2

Efficiency

63.8

Usage

24.7

Consistency

59.2

Best Game by takeover score

Missouri

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 34. Western Kentucky: 29. Idaho: 107. Washington: 110. South Dakota State: 59. Kansas State: 110. Texas: 43. Oklahoma State: 52. Missouri: 321. Iowa State: 99. Kansas: 85. Texas A&M: 74. Colorado: 77. Oklahoma: 91

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 11 by 32.2. Western Kentucky: 5 by 60.4. Idaho: 9 by 99.5. Washington: 10 by 95.8. South Dakota State: 19 by 32.3. Kansas State: 8 by 100. Texas: 11 by 40.7. Oklahoma State: 14 by 37.4. Missouri: 29 by 96.1. Iowa State: 22 by 46.9. Kansas: 18 by 49.2. Texas A&M: 11 by 64.1. Colorado: 15 by 53.5. Oklahoma: 11 by 84.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins104.9 · Games = 10 · +44.4 vs Losses
Losses60.5 · Games = 4 · -44.4 vs Wins