Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
West Virginia paired 488 primary output with 55.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | West Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | West Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | West Virginia | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| 2017 Postseason | West Virginia | 5 | 117 | 129 | -12 | 1 | 61 |
| 2017 Regular Season | West Virginia | 5 | 371 | 407 | -36 | 2 | 61 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 9 | 276 | 286 | -10 | 6 | 37.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
West Virginia paired 488 primary output with 55.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 60.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across West Virginia, Ohio State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with 86 yards of offense and 95.2 efficiency. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
30.7
Efficiency
60.8
Usage
3.7
Consistency
23.1
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: -2. Cincinnati: 14. Indiana: 6. Miami (OH): 86. Northwestern: 7. Wisconsin: 0. Maryland: 93. Rutgers: 61. Michigan: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 66.7. Cincinnati: 2 by 86.1. Indiana: 4 by 54.2. Miami (OH): 7 by 95.2. Northwestern: 2 by 59.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 0. Maryland: 14 by 62.7. Rutgers: 14 by 57.3. Michigan: 2 by 65.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.