Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Rutgers
Jon Bateky
DL • 6'3" • 298 lbs • Boyds, MD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jon Bateky shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.1
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
15.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jon Bateky, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Rutgers. Jon Bateky shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Jon Bateky played DL for Rutgers. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jon Bateky recorded 86 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 5.5 primary output with 14.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
21.1
Usage
10.1
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 0.5. Ohio State: 0. Kansas: 0. Buffalo: 1. Indiana: 2. Illinois: 0. Maryland: 0. Northwestern: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Michigan: 2. Penn State: 0. Michigan State: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 2 by 13.3. Ohio State: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 1 by 4.2. Buffalo: 5 by 30.8. Indiana: 4 by 36.7. Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 6 by 25. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 2 by 8.3. Michigan: 5 by 40.8. Penn State: 4 by 16.7. Michigan State: 5 by 35.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0.6 · Games = 11
First Half0.6 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
All Games0.6 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Michigan State | L 10-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Penn State | L 7-20 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Michigan | L 7-42 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Northwestern | L 15-18 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Maryland | L 7-34 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Illinois | L 17-38 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Indiana | L 17-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Buffalo | L 13-42 | 5 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas | L 14-55 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Ohio State | L 3-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Texas State | W 35-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 5.5 | 14.2 | 4.7 | 5.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rutgers | 6 | 19.6 | 6.2 | 0.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rutgers | 7 | 21.1 | 10.1 | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.5 takeover score.
#3
Indiana
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.7 takeover score.
#4
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#5
Nebraska
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
5.5 primary output · 14.2 efficiency · 4.7 usage
18
#2
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
15.2
7 primary · 21.1 efficiency · 10.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
13.5
6 primary · 19.6 efficiency · 6.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8322
Poolesville · Poolesville, MD
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
86
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.