Player Stats

Desmond Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,904
Rushing yards
1,626
Receiving yards
278
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss172720156.9
2010 PostseasonSouthern Miss101021020173.7
2010 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss10681509172873.7
2011 PostseasonSouthern Miss782775062.5
2011 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss742534778262.5
2012 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss954251923362.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Southern Miss paired 783 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boise State

Loss with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Regular Season · Southern Miss

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

60.2

Efficiency

55.2

Usage

20.8

Consistency

67.8

Best Game by takeover score

Boise State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 60. East Carolina: 84. Western Kentucky: 39. Louisville: 94. Boise State: 116. UCF: 35. Marshall: 39. Rice: 11. UTEP: 64

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 10 by 64.1. East Carolina: 14 by 61.5. Western Kentucky: 10 by 40.6. Louisville: 14 by 69.9. Boise State: 15 by 80.6. UCF: 10 by 36.5. Marshall: 4 by 90.6. Rice: 8 by 14.3. UTEP: 17 by 38.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half78.6 · Games = 5 · +41.3 vs Second Half
Second Half37.3 · Games = 4 · -41.3 vs First Half