Usage Score
26
Player Dossier
2009-2012Notre Dame
Deion Walker
WR • 6'3" • Christchurch, VA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Deion Walker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.9
Consistency
57.5
Season Value
63.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Notre Dame • Massachusetts
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deion Walker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Deion Walker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 667 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
60.6
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
26
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 24. Michigan: 63. Miami (OH): 81. Ohio: 162. Western Michigan: 81. Bowling Green: 13. Vanderbilt: 51. Northern Illinois: 15. Akron: 47. Buffalo: 83. Central Michigan: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 1 by 100. Michigan: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 90. Ohio: 11 by 98.2. Western Michigan: 9 by 60. Bowling Green: 3 by 28.9. Vanderbilt: 6 by 56.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 50. Akron: 5 by 62.7. Buffalo: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 44.8
Split Comparison
Losses62 · n=10
First Half70.7 · n=6 · +22.1 vs Second Half
Second Half48.6 · n=5 · -22.1 vs First Half
All Games60.6 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan | L 21-42 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Buffalo | L 19-29 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Akron | W 22-14 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-63 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-49 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Bowling Green | L 0-24 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Western MichiganHigh volume | L 14-52 | — | 9 | 81 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-37 | — | 11 | 162 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Miami (OH) | L 16-27 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Michigan | L 13-63 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Indiana | L 6-45 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2009-2011
Opening stop
- 2
Massachusetts
2012
Final stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 15 | 100 | 5.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | -15 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 667 | 71.9 | 26 | 667 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 98.2 efficiency score.
#2
Nevada
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
667 primary output · 71.9 efficiency · 26 usage
63.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Notre Dame
52
15 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Notre Dame
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9572
Christchurch School · Church View, VA
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
682
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.