Usage Score
19.7
Player Dossier
2008-2010Notre Dame
TE • 6'6" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Kyle Rudolph reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.7
Efficiency
49.1
Consistency
35.8
Season Value
48.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Rudolph, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Kyle Rudolph reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 364 primary output with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 49.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
54.7
Efficiency
49.1
Usage
19.7
Consistency
35.8
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 43. Michigan: 164. Michigan State: 80. Stanford: 1. Boston College: 2. Pittsburgh: 38
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 5 by 57.3. Michigan: 8 by 100. Michigan State: 8 by 66.7. Stanford: 1 by 6.7. Boston College: 1 by 13.3. Pittsburgh: 5 by 50.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Notre Dame | 340 | 67.3 | 11.4 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 340 | 67.3 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 364 | 69.6 | 16 | 24 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 328 | 49.1 | 19.7 | -36 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
164
Primary metric
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan State
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Hawai'i
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Notre Dame
364 primary output · 69.6 efficiency · 16 usage
61.6
#2
2008 Postseason · Notre Dame
58.8
340 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Notre Dame
58.8
340 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 11.4 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9832
Elder · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,032
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kyle Rudolph quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit